Journal of Cerebrovascular Disease 2022 Vol.5 No.2 6-10
Effect of Predictive Nursing on Limb Rehabilitation in Patients with Cerebral Haemorrhage: A Randomized Controlled Study
Author(s): Qing Li1,Li-Juan Shen2,Xing-Ming Zhong3,Wan-Yi He3,Jie Song4,Li-Ying Shen5
Affiliation(s):
1School of Nursing, Huzhou University
2Department of Nursing, Huzhou First People's Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University)
3Department of Neurosurgery, Huzhou First People's Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University)
4Department of Rehabilitation, Huzhou First People's Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University)
5Department of Radiation, Huzhou First People's Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University)
Corresponding Author: Xing-Ming Zhong
Corresponding email(s): zxm@zjhu.edu.cn
Key Words: Diffusion tensor imaging; Basal ganglia haemorrhage; Foreseeable care; Limb function; Rehabilitation
Abstract:
Objective: To
explore the effect of predictive nursing on limb rehabilitation in patients
with spontaneous hypertensive cerebral haemorrhage in the basal ganglia region
based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) technology.
Methods: From
January 2020 to January 2021, 55 patients with spontaneous hypertensive cerebral
haemorrhage in the basal ganglia were selected from the Department of
Neurosurgery, Huzhou First People's Hospital. They were randomly divided into a
control group and an experimental group. The control group was given routine
nursing measures, and the experimental group was assigned predictive nursing
based on DTI. After three weeks of intervention, the two groups' nursing
effects were compared. The Fugl-Meyer motor assessment (FMA)
and modified Barthel index (MBI) scoring scale were used to evaluate patients'
motor function and daily living activities.
Results: After
three weeks of intervention, motor function scores improved in both groups
compared with before treatment (P < 0.05). There was a statistically
significant difference in FMA scores between the experimental and control
groups before and after the intervention (P < 0.001). The MBI scores of the two groups before and
after the intervention were statistically significant (P < 0.001).
From the mean point of view, the MBI score of the experimental group after the
intervention was significantly higher than that before the intervention.